Bruce Schneier's article "AI and Trust" highlights the critical role of trust in society and discusses the potential challenges and risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). Here are some key points and reflections:
Two Types of Trust: Schneier distinguishes between interpersonal trust and social trust. Interpersonal trust is based on personal connections, while social trust relies on the predictability and reliability of systems. He argues that the confusion between these two types of trust may increase with the advent of AI.
AI as Services, Not Friends: Schneier cautions against the common tendency to anthropomorphize AI, treating them as friends when they are essentially services. He draws parallels with corporations, emphasizing that corporations are profit-maximizing entities, not moral agents.
Corporate Control and Exploitation: The author expresses concern that corporations controlling AI systems may take advantage of the confusion between interpersonal and social trust to exploit users. He argues that corporations are profit-driven and may not always act in the best interest of users.
Relational and Intimate AI: Schneier predicts that AI systems, particularly those with natural language interfaces, will become more relational and intimate. Users may be inclined to trust them as friends, despite their fundamentally service-oriented nature.
Challenges of Trusting AI: The article highlights potential failures in trusting AI, including hidden exploitation, fraud, mistaken expertise, incompetency, inconsistency, and illegality. These failures could arise due to the lack of transparency and understanding of AI behavior, biases, and training.
The Need for Trustworthy AI: Schneier emphasizes the importance of trustworthy AI, where the behavior, limitations, biases, and training of AI systems are well-understood. He argues that the market alone may not provide this, and government intervention is necessary.
Government Regulation and AI Transparency Laws: The author suggests that government regulations should focus on AI transparency, safety, and the trustworthiness of AI controllers. He calls for laws that enforce accountability and penalties for untrustworthy behavior.
Public AI Models: Schneier advocates for the development of public AI models built by academia, non-profit groups, or governments. These models would be owned and run by individuals, providing an alternative to corporate-owned AI.
Government's Role in Creating Trust: The overarching theme is that the role of government is to create social trust by constraining the behavior of corporations and the AIs they deploy. Government intervention is seen as essential to ensuring predictability and reliability in society.
In conclusion, Schneier argues for a regulatory framework that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and the creation of trustworthy AI systems to mitigate potential risks and abuses in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Just for fun
Date: 2023-12-04 04:46 pm (UTC)Bruce Schneier's article "AI and Trust" highlights the critical role of trust in society and discusses the potential challenges and risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). Here are some key points and reflections:
Schneier distinguishes between interpersonal trust and social trust. Interpersonal trust is based on personal connections, while social trust relies on the predictability and reliability of systems. He argues that the confusion between these two types of trust may increase with the advent of AI.
Schneier cautions against the common tendency to anthropomorphize AI, treating them as friends when they are essentially services. He draws parallels with corporations, emphasizing that corporations are profit-maximizing entities, not moral agents.
The author expresses concern that corporations controlling AI systems may take advantage of the confusion between interpersonal and social trust to exploit users. He argues that corporations are profit-driven and may not always act in the best interest of users.
Schneier predicts that AI systems, particularly those with natural language interfaces, will become more relational and intimate. Users may be inclined to trust them as friends, despite their fundamentally service-oriented nature.
The article highlights potential failures in trusting AI, including hidden exploitation, fraud, mistaken expertise, incompetency, inconsistency, and illegality. These failures could arise due to the lack of transparency and understanding of AI behavior, biases, and training.
Schneier emphasizes the importance of trustworthy AI, where the behavior, limitations, biases, and training of AI systems are well-understood. He argues that the market alone may not provide this, and government intervention is necessary.
The author suggests that government regulations should focus on AI transparency, safety, and the trustworthiness of AI controllers. He calls for laws that enforce accountability and penalties for untrustworthy behavior.
Schneier advocates for the development of public AI models built by academia, non-profit groups, or governments. These models would be owned and run by individuals, providing an alternative to corporate-owned AI.
The overarching theme is that the role of government is to create social trust by constraining the behavior of corporations and the AIs they deploy. Government intervention is seen as essential to ensuring predictability and reliability in society.
In conclusion, Schneier argues for a regulatory framework that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and the creation of trustworthy AI systems to mitigate potential risks and abuses in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.